Writing a literature based dissertation outline
It should outline the focus of the review — in other words, it should clearly state the main topics to be covered. However, this is not straightforward.
But that means you've nevertheless sacrificed a quantitative approach to your problem that might have yielded its own set of important insights.
Your dissertation methodology should therefore offer value in and of itself, and be both rigorous and reproducible.
We can match you with an academic who's an expert in your field of study, and who can work with you every step of the way. Read back over the sample and try to perfect this skill. Your arguments and interpretation of a research topic must be backed by evidence. Another way of organising your content is according to theme; or sub-themes, if your review focuses on one overarching topic. In addition to answering all these questions, you must satisfy your reader that you have considered all the ethical questions associated with your research. What is the scope of your data and conclusions? Note how skilfully, in the earlier sample paragraph by Reed , he weaves his opinions with references. Say so, in a way that the reader will understand easily. Does this interpretation differ considerably from other viewpoints in the literature? Feeling overwhelmed by your literature review? In summary… Your methodology is a vital section of your dissertation, which both demonstrates your ability to synthesise the range of information you've read in your field, and your capacity to design original research that draws from the traditions and precedents of your discipline to answer your research question s. A quick search using keywords on Google Scholar will often give you a quick overview of the available literature. A literature review may also provide a thorough and critical outline of the intellectual developments in a field with a focus on major, and often polemical, debates. Regardless of your level, your dissertation methodology will develop as you review the literature in your field and refine your initial research questions. No part of your dissertation should be hermetically sealed off from the others, and there will undoubtedly be some overlap between your methodology and literature review section, for example.
Your methods must appear robust to the reader, with no obvious flaws in the design or execution. Defining your own terms If you don't define your own measures for success and failure, readers can infer from the overall structure of your argument the terms on which it was trying to succeed, and judge it accordingly.
If your methodology takes a bold new step that some may find off-putting, you can acknowledge this whilst taking extra care to emphasise its grounded relationship to established work in the field.
To structure the body of work chronologically, you will have to organise your sources based on when they were published. Their own work might build upon, develop or modify your methodology in some way; they might apply your methodology to a different data set in order to contest your findings, or they might even take it and apply it in a new context that hadn't even occurred to you!
Writing a dissertation for dummies pdf
Another way of organising your content is according to theme; or sub-themes, if your review focuses on one overarching topic. Identify sources To write a good dissertation literature review, you need to have a fair idea of what sources you would like to review. No part of your dissertation should be hermetically sealed off from the others, and there will undoubtedly be some overlap between your methodology and literature review section, for example. Even if you decided on your methodology early on in your research process, it should appear rhetorically as the result of a careful weighing of competing factors, before you decided on the most logical choice. A crucial but often neglected component of this persuasive function is the role of rhetoric in persuading your audience of the merits of your work. This is the sort of critical engagement expected in a literature review. Your methodology should also include details of — and justifications for — the statistical models you'll use to analyse your data. Consider gaps in the research When writing a dissertation literature review , an essential thing to consider is identifying the research gap. Remember also to generally use present tense when referring to opinions and theories although in the context of specific research experiments, the use of the past tense is better.
Feeling overwhelmed by your literature review? In scientific reviews however, a methodological approach may form the basis of the discussions in the body.
Dissertation chapter 1 example
During the second stage of your reading, you can then take a more critical, in-depth look at your sources. For this reason it can be tempting to gloss over the methodology section in an arts or humanities dissertation, and move more or less seamlessly from literature review into analysis. A crucial but often neglected component of this persuasive function is the role of rhetoric in persuading your audience of the merits of your work. Raw data The methodology section is not the place to reproduce any data, even if you're illustrating how a questionnaire or other data-gathering mechanic works. Write the conclusion The conclusion of a dissertation literature review should always include a summary of the implications of the literature, which you should then link to your argument or general research question. What is your interpretation of a particular source? Literature review done? So, in short, a literature review is essential, and you need to put the necessary time into getting it right. If you are not familiar with academic writing, going through samples will help you to get a sense of what is expected in this regard. As the next section of this blog is quite lengthy, we've broken it down into several key steps which should make it easier to follow when writing your own dissertation literature review. However, in virtually all cases, your creative project must be accompanied by a substantial critical essay or introduction, or commentary that theorises your creative practice. Will you focus on mainly qualitative or quantitative studies, or a mixture of both? Also, remember that the bibliography or reference section of your selected texts will help you to snowball further references if you need any. How about your methodology?
based on 68 review